By Judith Lamont
Law enforcement is an information-intensive process,
beginning with data collection at crime scenes and extending
through records management and analysis of data to support
crime-solving. Like other organizations, law enforcement
agencies have been seeking ways to use software products to
support their activities. Whether a law enforcement agency
operates at the local, state or federal level, the need to
integrate information from multiple data sources and the need
to analyze it to produce actionable information are at the
forefront.
CoplinkConnect from Knowledge Computing
allows police departments to integrate data from different
databases within their department as well as from other
jurisdictions. Another product, CoplinkDetect, uses artificial
intelligence to establish links among different elements in
criminal databases. The technology used in those products was
developed at the Artificial Intelligence Lab at the University
of Arizona in Tucson (ai.bpa.arizona.edu) under a $1.2 million
contract from the National Institute for Justice (NIJ), part
of the Department of Justice DOJ. The Lab worked closely
with the police department in Tucson to develop the products.
Douglas Smith, who served for five years as chief of police
in Tucson, joined Knowledge Computing last year to help bring
the newly developed technology to community law enforcement
agencies. Tucson and Phoenix are both using Coplink products,
and the surrounding suburban agencies are also beginning to
take a regional view of data sharing. Criminals are mobile,
and likely to commit crimes outside their immediate
communities. Being able to share data regionally helps locate
criminals who have crossed jurisdictional boundaries.
Smith puts a new spin on the 80-20 rule: “Eighty percent of
crimes are committed by 20% of the criminal community,” Smith
says. Therefore, being able to link certain individuals to a
co-occurence with a vehicle, other individual or identifying
physical characteristics can be very helpful.
“Last week we had a case in which a 7-year-old child was
killed and the driver of the car ran, leaving his girlfriend
behind,” says Smith. “She refused to name the driver, but by
using CoplinkConnect we were immediately able to find out her
other offenses and connect her to an individual who turned out
to be the driver.”
Coplink products are set up on a middleware server, with a
physical data repository. “Some other data integration systems
work by accessing the databases on the fly,” says Smith. “But
if one of these is down, then the data becomes unavailable.”
The database is refreshed at a specified frequency, which can
be as often as every few minutes. The software itself is free;
Coplink charges for set up and maintenance. User studies have
shown a 65% savings in time resulting from CoplinkConnect.
Knowledge Computing is one of the few law enforcement
software companies that explicitly positions its products in
the knowledge management space. The company defines knowledge
management in its domain as “a systemized approach to
collecting, processing and organizing law enforcement-specific
knowledge to support the functions and decisions made by the
agency members.”
Linking crime data
CrimeSoft Plus from CrimeSoft provides
linkages among data elements to highlight key information for
law enforcement officers. The software was developed as a
custom product for a sheriff’s department in the Kansas City,
MO, area, and after becoming popular with several other police
departments in the region, was commercialized.
Bernie Diable, CEO of CrimeSoft, was one of the original
programmers and is also a former detective. “We tried to cover
the bases for most police departments,” says Diable, “from
dispatching to chain of custody for property seized.”
CrimeSoft records begin with a crime/incident reporting
section, and all other reports and supplements are linked to
that main report. Individuals listed in the main report are
automatically entered into a master name file, which contains
more than 90 data fields. Linked to numerous other CrimeSoft
files, the master name file serves as the hub for alerts. When
a police officer runs a license plate number, for example,
buttons on one side of the interface provide alerts if any
mention of weapons is connected to the individual or any
warrants are outstanding. A “find” feature can conduct a
free-text search in the narrative section and also in each
data field. The product is said to be easy to use, with most
officers up and running on it in less than an hour. It is
priced to be affordable for small to midsize departments, but
is scalable to handle data for large metropolitan departments.
Jeff Straub, chief of police in Taylor, TX, likes the
ability of CrimeSoft to build a photo lineup. An officer can
put in criteria such as “a white male, over six feet tall,
driving a red car,” and in a matter of seconds, CrimeSoft
creates from its database a set of pictures of suspects who
meet those criteria. The witness can look at a printout and
see if any match the person seen in an incident.
Some of the most critical information in crime scenes must
be documented in diagrams rather than text. The Crime Zone
software package from The
CAD Zone allows police officers to enter dimensions of
rooms, place images of common objects and perform other data
entry operations that recreate a crime scene.
“We are told almost every day that officers did not have to
go to court after the defendant saw how detailed the
description was,” says Janice White, co-founder of The CAD
Zone. “They plead guilty.” A precise description can, for
example, prove that the trajectory of a bullet contradicted a
defendant’s claim about how an incident occurred. The Crime
Zone can be integrated with large-scale records management
systems so that users do not have to exit from the primary
application to draw the crime scene. Sometimes investigating
officers draw hand sketches at the scene, and then transfer
them to The Crime Zone, while other times they bring a laptop
to the scene. The product’s ease of use is an asset to police
officers, who have little time for training on software
products. The CAD Zone is planning options that allow officers
to enter data into Windows CE handheld computers, although
that software will not have the full functionality of the
computer product. The company also provides other drawing
products such as The Crash Zone, which documents vehicle
accidents.
Miami vice
As supervisor of the Intelligence Analyst Unit for the
Miami Police Department in the 1990s, Scott Nugent oversaw a
progression from typed reports and index cards to a Burroughs
B38 that supported the first local computer network in the
department. When the time came to migrate to Windows, he
converted 10,000 documents to Microsoft Word and looked for an
indexing tool that would help locate relevant reports for the
Special Investigation Section, which dealt primarily with
narcotics and organized crime. After a referral from a sheriff
during a homicide case, he settled on ISYS from Odyssey Development.
“Police officers spend a lot of time documenting what they
have done,” says Nugent, “which takes away from research and
crime-solving.” He opted for an unstructured text system over
a database because it allowed the department to use existing
criminal reports without having to re-enter data into fields.
“Document repositories and databases each have value,”
Nugent observes, “depending on the activity. Our type of
investigational research lent itself better to documents.” The
document-oriented approach also allowed easy incorporation and
retrieval of outside reports.
Nugent cites a broader issue that has parallels in
commercial enterprises: a gap between content experts and IT
staff who deliver computer systems.
“Sometimes the computer experts want to provide certain
features just because it can be done,” he says “which can make
things cumbersome for users.” He also describes a problem that
plagues virtually every law enforcement agency regardless of
level--the long lead time required for budget approval. The
time lapse virtually ensures that agencies will be hard
pressed both to incorporate the latest and best technology
into their work, and to respond in a timely fashion to
changing circumstances.
The Regional Information Sharing Systems RISS program of the
Institute for Intergovernmental Research is another initiative
designed to support government cooperation in crime fighting.
It consists of six regional centers that include more than
6,000 law enforcement agencies at the municipal, county, state
and federal level. Among the capabilities provided by RISS are
databases, analytical skills and communications networks. A
secure collaboration environment in which leads can be posted
is also available.
“We have been able to get immediate access to information
and have various agencies be in touch with one another
regarding criminal elements they are looking for,” says Gerard
Lynch, executive director of the Middle Atlantic-Great Lakes
Organized Crime Law Enforcement Network, one of the six
regional centers.
Many statewide databases are being connected to RISS to
allow more users to have access; it is one of the few federal
databases to which local jurisdictions can have access. The
regional centers conduct analyses for member agencies that
assist them in looking at crime patterns. RISS uses several
commercial online analytical processing (OLAP) tools to aid
them in detecting those patterns. However, according to Lynch,
the ability of RISS to provide a broadband communications
backbone for collaboration has become as important as the data
sharing itself.
In some situations such as drug interdiction at the U.S.
border, collaboration among multiple agencies is critical. “We
don’t share data as much as we share conclusions,” says Tony
Coulson, executive assistant to the CIO of the Drug
Enforcement Administration DEA. The El Paso
Intelligence Center (EPIC, usdoj.gov/dea/programs/epic.htm)
supports interdiction efforts by disseminating intelligence on
drug activities to other relevant agencies such as the U.S. Customs
Service and INS.
Coulson points out that depending on the effort at hand,
raw data is not necessarily that helpful to other agencies.
“You may have mountains of data, but what does it mean?
Interpreting the data and making decisions is the most
important part of the process,” he maintains.
A database can be very useful when a particular piece of
information is sought, such as a fingerprint match. For tasks
that require interpretive work, however, more complex
collaborative processes are required. The DEA uses OLAP tools
to detect patterns in data, which are then studied. As in the
private sector, the challenge is to determine a course of
action based on the best available information.
Millions of fingerprints
At the federal level, data integration is also a priority.
The U.S. Department of Justice is funding an effort to
integrate the fingerprint identification databases of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service INS, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation FBI. The plan
dates back to 2000, when Congress initiated the integration
project. However, in view of the terrorist attacks, the
program now has a greater sense of urgency.
Large-scale integration efforts pose significant technical
challenges. The FBI Integrated Automated Fingerprint
Identification System (IAFIS) contains more than 40 million
sets of fingerprints. The INS Automated Biometric
Identification System (IDENT) includes photographs,
fingerprints and criminal history data for individuals
apprehended by INS dating from the late 1990s. The integration
is a long-term effort that is planned as a phased
implementation, some of which has already taken place. Even
that initial integration has had an impact in terms of
apprehending individuals who would previously not have been
identified as a threat. Future phases will add new
capabilities, but the integration process is complex.